Revelation - Part 2 - Getting started

Part 2 – Exploring Revelation

                So if you read the first article (Interpretation Foundation) then you have a foundation on which to build your interpretation (study, deep dive, meditation, or whatever term you choose).  You should also be aware then that we (should I say me – and you are invited) are going to be going down the path of studying and exploring the book of Revelation.

So let’s get started with some more basic items to prepare ourselves.  The first place I like to start is with who, why, where, what, when, and how questions.  Answering these questions can really open you up to some new insights that you may have overlooked before, especially if you always approach the text with a 21^st century mindset.

Who: John the apostle wrote the book of Revelation.  This is the same apostle that wrote the Gospel of John and three epistles 1, 2, and 3 John.  He was part of Jesus’ inner circle of apostles (along with Peter and James).  He stood by the cross and was charged by Jesus to look after Mary. He was one who raced to the empty tomb the day it was found to be empty. He was referred to as “the disciple whom Jesus loved”.  John outlived all the other apostles – and outlived the Caesar who had him imprisoned for following Christ.  You will find much debate amongst the “scholars” on whether this John is the same who wrote the gospel and the epistles.  You’ll find some that state the writing style is too different to be the same man.  I say the writings are three different genres for three different purposes and maybe he just wrote them differently based on that need.  Either way, I see no need to challenge the authorship.  I am inclined to agree with those that were with the disciples at the time, the early church fathers that declared and ultimately agreed that this John, was the same as the apostle John and the author of the other books.

Why: Sometimes it is important to understand “why” an author wrote what he wrote.  While all of the scripture is God inspired, some had some really personal reasons for being written.  Take for example the epistles to the various churches.  Those letters were to help those early churches to grow, stay strong, and correct some of their erroneous ways.  Revelation is slightly different.  John wrote Revelation because he was commanded to by Jesus.  Revelation 1:11 and 1:19, “Write on a scroll what you see…” This was not John’s idea to share this information with the seven churches.  It was not his idea to capture a vision of the future.  He was told to write what he was told and what he was going to see in the vision.  Basically, he was told “Write this down.  It is important.”

Where:  John wrote Revelation while imprisoned on the island of Patmos (Rev 1:9).  He was imprisoned there by Caesar for preaching about Jesus.  Caesar sentenced him to remain in prison till death, but John outlived the Caesar and was released shortly after completing Revelation. Some feel that Revelation was secretly passed out of the prison piece by piece until it was completed.

What: What this book is about – well that is the whole point of this exercise isn’t it? Here is a brief look into what is to come - Persecution, the rise of evil, encouragement, perseverance, the defeat of evil, the reign of Jesus.  Victory.

When: There is much debate (as always…) but the general consensus is that John wrote this around 95 AD.  John outlived all the other apostles, and it may be that this was the last inspired work.

How:  I use the “how” for a number of various definitions, mostly, the genre.  Revelation is apocalyptic literature.  That means it is going to be highly symbolic and prophetic.  It was very popular at the time.  The word “apocalyptic” in Greek, means “revelation” (an unveiling or unfolding of things not previously known and which could not be known apart from the unveiling).

Now that we have established a baseline (and while I understand that we may not all agree on all the items listed above, it is important that you understand the stance from where I will be writing this articles as well as others), let us now look at some of the most debated aspects of the book in whole, before we dive into some of the specifics within the book.

First, let us revisit Rev 1:8, where Jesus states he is “who is, and who was, and who is to come.”  Also, in Rev 1:19, John is instructed to “write what you have seen, what is now, and what will take place later.”  Both of these statements (especially 1:19) set the book of Revelation into an organization pattern of three elements John is to describe.  “What you have seen” – things of the past; “what is now” – things occurring at the time of writing (letters to the churches); and “what will take place later” – prophesies of future events.  Some of the writings clearly fall into those categories, but the book of Revelation itself is widely debated as to where it falls within those confines, and the arguments for each are all strong and remarkable.  Here is a brief overview of each of the four main views on the placement of the book’s events.

1.       Preterist – the described events took place in the 1st century

2.       Historical – the events that take place from the writing up until Christ’s return

3.       Futurist – the end times leading to Christ’s victory

4.       Idealist – a symbolic writing of God’s triumphs over evil with no direct ties to actual events.

So it is with this knowledge that I submit the following.  God is the most awesome author to ever write a book, and he has written Revelation to satisfy all of the differing views of the interpretation of the text.  If notable scholars can clearly define how the four horsemen fit the early Roman empire, then why argue that point.  It fit the people of that day and allowed them to draw closer to the word of God based on the relevancy of the prophecies.  Could those same conclusions be applied to other periods of history?  Absolutely.  Do the events foretell some future occurrence when the antichrist will rise and reign? Most definitely.  So although I am a futurist by choice (design, nature, whatever), I do not discount the application of the visions to the other methodologies – in fact I think they only strengthen God’s power that it can occur that way.  So when John wrote about one of the visions he saw, he was describing something that was seen (the past), was (the now), and is to come (the future) – each vision fits and continues to fit multiple applications. The only thing I caution you on (or do not agree with) is if someone claims the victory has already occurred, and that tribulation is occurring right now, or the antichrist is already in power.  I think the culmination of those events is going to be quite dramatic and unmistakable – and those events are truly for the end times.

The next thing I’d like to discuss is symbolism in general.  Most people have a pretty good grasp of symbolism and what it means.  The symbolism arguments usually center on whether the symbolism is a Literal Interpretation (the events will occur just as described) or Metaphoric Interpretation (these descriptions use familiar things to describe unfamiliar events).  For most writing styles the interpretation is pretty straight forward - metaphoric.  However, when dealing with the Bible, and especially prophetic visions, this is a pretty daunting task – since God can create anything, any symbolic description is possible as a reality (not saying they all are, but that option exists for each one).

We can surely find examples of both throughout the Bible.  Literal: Moses parting the Red Sea, Jesus feeding the 5,000. Both of those acts are so magnificent of an accomplishment, on human standards they would have to be metaphoric – but since these were actions by God, they are literal events.  Metaphoric: the serpent in the garden, the four horsemen.  Again, these could be literal – Eve could have been tempted by a large snake, but most likely the attributes of a snake were simply given to Satan in this instance. Then we can find some that could be either – many people debate if the entire book of Jonah is metaphoric (I don’t think so, I think it is literal), almost the entire book of Revelation can be debated along those lines (the woman on the beast, the great Abyss). 

Particularly with prophetic literature, that is the purpose for the symbolism; it is meant to be vague enough to only be realized after the prophecy has come true.  That way people don’t have enough information to either purposefully ‘help’ the prophecy or purposefully try to stop it. 

While this brief explanation of symbolism will leave you with as many questions as you had before, it was never intended to answer them for you.  It is merely to help you break down the barriers and fear of digging into the Bible’s unknown and confusing areas.  So many people avoid Revelation because they fear they will not be able to decipher all the clues and information contained there.  You don’t have to worry about that.  What you need to do is approach it with an open heart and allow the Spirit to guide your study.  The Spirit will lead you where you need to go, and you’ll find insight into those areas needed for understanding.  The bottom line is that it doesn’t matter if actual “locusts” are going to devour or if “fallen angels” are going to devour like locust.  What does matter is that you get the message God is sending you.

One last thing in regards to symbolism I would like to discuss, and this is an area you can get caught up in that may distract your study, is the fads such as numerology or other “secret codes” within the Bible.  You will find any number of fantastic discoveries of secrets from within the Bible such as “Shakespeare in Psalms”, etc.  I will be the first to admit, I find some of these things fascinating – but let me assure you, God’s message to you is NOT HIDDEN in some mathematical equation that causes you to piece words together.  So you can enjoy these little “trivia” pieces if you’d like, but please do not take them as being the intended message.  Find that intended message with your own study.

This concludes part 2 of the “interpretation” lesson.  I know there probably wasn’t anything overly groundbreaking for you in these, but remember – this is my journey into Revelation (I’m just letting you tag along for the ride).  See you next week in the next article (I hope you come back.)