Part 2 – Exploring Revelation
So
if you read the first article (Interpretation Foundation)
then you have a foundation on which to build your interpretation (study, deep
dive, meditation, or whatever term you choose). You should also be aware then that we (should
I say me – and you are invited) are going to be going down the path of studying
and exploring the book of Revelation.
So let’s get started with some
more basic items to prepare ourselves.
The first place I like to start is with who, why, where, what, when, and
how questions. Answering these questions
can really open you up to some new insights that you may have overlooked
before, especially if you always approach the text with a 21st
century mindset.
Who: John the
apostle wrote the book of Revelation.
This is the same apostle that wrote the Gospel of John and three
epistles 1, 2, and 3 John. He was part
of Jesus’ inner circle of apostles (along with Peter and James). He stood by the cross and was charged by
Jesus to look after Mary. He was one who raced to the empty tomb the day it was
found to be empty. He was referred to as “the disciple whom Jesus loved”. John outlived all the other apostles – and
outlived the Caesar who had him imprisoned for following Christ. You will find much debate amongst the
“scholars” on whether this John is the same who wrote the gospel and the
epistles. You’ll find some that state
the writing style is too different to be the same man. I say the writings are three different genres
for three different purposes and maybe he just wrote them differently based on
that need. Either way, I see no need to
challenge the authorship. I am inclined
to agree with those that were with the disciples at the time, the early church
fathers that declared and ultimately agreed that this John, was the same as the
apostle John and the author of the other books.
Why: Sometimes
it is important to understand “why” an author wrote what he wrote. While all of the scripture is God inspired,
some had some really personal reasons for being written. Take for example the epistles to the various
churches. Those letters were to help
those early churches to grow, stay strong, and correct some of their erroneous
ways. Revelation is slightly
different. John wrote Revelation because
he was commanded to by Jesus. Revelation
1:11 and 1:19, “Write on a scroll what you see…” This was not John’s idea to
share this information with the seven churches.
It was not his idea to capture a vision of the future. He was told to write what he was told and
what he was going to see in the vision.
Basically, he was told “Write this down.
It is important.”
Where: John wrote Revelation while imprisoned on the
island of Patmos (Rev 1:9). He was
imprisoned there by Caesar for preaching about Jesus. Caesar sentenced him to remain in prison till
death, but John outlived the Caesar and was released shortly after completing
Revelation. Some feel that Revelation was secretly passed out of the prison
piece by piece until it was completed.
What: What this
book is about – well that is the whole point of this exercise isn’t it? Here is
a brief look into what is to come - Persecution, the rise of evil,
encouragement, perseverance, the defeat of evil, the reign of Jesus. Victory.
When: There is
much debate (as always…) but the general consensus is that John wrote this
around 95 AD. John outlived all the
other apostles, and it may be that this was the last inspired work.
How: I use the “how” for a number of various
definitions, mostly, the genre.
Revelation is apocalyptic literature.
That means it is going to be highly symbolic and prophetic. It was very popular at the time. The word “apocalyptic” in Greek, means
“revelation” (an unveiling or unfolding of things not previously known and
which could not be known apart from the unveiling).
Now that we have established a
baseline (and while I understand that we may not all agree on all the items
listed above, it is important that you understand the stance from where I will
be writing this articles as well as others), let us now look at some of the
most debated aspects of the book in whole, before we dive into some of the
specifics within the book.
First, let us revisit Rev 1:8,
where Jesus states he is “who is, and who was, and who is to come.” Also, in Rev 1:19, John is instructed to
“write what you have seen, what is now, and what will take place later.” Both of these statements (especially 1:19)
set the book of Revelation into an organization pattern of three elements John
is to describe. “What you have seen” –
things of the past; “what is now” – things occurring at the time of writing
(letters to the churches); and “what will take place later” – prophesies of
future events. Some of the writings
clearly fall into those categories, but the book of Revelation itself is widely
debated as to where it falls within those confines, and the arguments for each
are all strong and remarkable. Here is a
brief overview of each of the four main views on the placement of the book’s
events.
1.
Preterist – the described
events took place in the 1st century
2.
Historical – the events
that take place from the writing up until Christ’s return
3.
Futurist – the end times
leading to Christ’s victory
4.
Idealist – a symbolic
writing of God’s triumphs over evil with no direct ties to actual events.
So it is with this knowledge that
I submit the following. God is the most
awesome author to ever write a book, and he has written Revelation to satisfy
all of the differing views of the interpretation of the text. If notable scholars can clearly define how
the four horsemen fit the early Roman empire, then why argue that point. It fit the people of that day and allowed
them to draw closer to the word of God based on the relevancy of the
prophecies. Could those same conclusions
be applied to other periods of history?
Absolutely. Do the events foretell
some future occurrence when the antichrist will rise and reign? Most
definitely. So although I am a futurist by
choice (design, nature, whatever), I do not discount the application of the
visions to the other methodologies – in fact I think they only strengthen God’s
power that it can occur that way. So
when John wrote about one of the visions he saw, he was describing something
that was seen (the past), was (the now), and is to come (the future) – each
vision fits and continues to fit multiple applications. The only thing I
caution you on (or do not agree with) is if someone claims the victory has already
occurred, and that tribulation is occurring right now, or the antichrist is
already in power. I think the
culmination of those events is going to be quite dramatic and unmistakable –
and those events are truly for the end times.
The next thing I’d like to discuss is symbolism in
general. Most people have a pretty good
grasp of symbolism and what it means.
The symbolism arguments usually center on whether the symbolism is a Literal Interpretation (the events will
occur just as described) or Metaphoric
Interpretation (these descriptions use familiar things to describe
unfamiliar events). For most writing styles
the interpretation is pretty straight forward - metaphoric. However, when dealing with the Bible, and especially
prophetic visions, this is a pretty daunting task – since God can create
anything, any symbolic description is possible as a reality (not saying they
all are, but that option exists for each one).
We can surely find examples of both throughout the Bible. Literal: Moses parting the Red Sea, Jesus
feeding the 5,000. Both of those acts are so magnificent of an accomplishment,
on human standards they would have to be metaphoric – but since these were
actions by God, they are literal events. Metaphoric: the serpent in the garden, the
four horsemen. Again, these could be
literal – Eve could have been tempted by a large snake, but most likely the
attributes of a snake were simply given to Satan in this instance. Then we can
find some that could be either – many people debate if the entire book of Jonah
is metaphoric (I don’t think so, I think it is literal), almost the entire book
of Revelation can be debated along those lines (the woman on the beast, the great
Abyss).
Particularly with prophetic literature, that is the purpose for
the symbolism; it is meant to be vague enough to only be realized after the
prophecy has come true. That way people
don’t have enough information to either purposefully ‘help’ the prophecy or
purposefully try to stop it.
While this brief explanation of symbolism will leave you with as
many questions as you had before, it was never intended to answer them for you. It is merely to help you break down the
barriers and fear of digging into the Bible’s unknown and confusing areas. So many people avoid Revelation because they
fear they will not be able to decipher all the clues and information contained
there. You don’t have to worry about that. What you need to do is approach it with an
open heart and allow the Spirit to guide your study. The Spirit will lead you where you need to
go, and you’ll find insight into those areas needed for understanding. The bottom line is that it doesn’t matter if actual
“locusts” are going to devour or if “fallen angels” are going to devour like
locust. What does matter is that you get
the message God is sending you.
One last thing in regards to symbolism I would like to discuss,
and this is an area you can get caught up in that may distract your study, is
the fads such as numerology or other “secret codes” within the Bible. You will find any number of fantastic
discoveries of secrets from within the Bible such as “Shakespeare in Psalms”,
etc. I will be the first to admit, I
find some of these things fascinating – but let me assure you, God’s message to
you is NOT HIDDEN in some mathematical equation that causes you to piece words
together. So you can enjoy these little “trivia”
pieces if you’d like, but please do not take them as being the intended
message. Find that intended message with
your own study.
This concludes part 2 of the “interpretation” lesson. I know there probably wasn’t anything overly
groundbreaking for you in these, but remember – this is my journey into
Revelation (I’m just letting you tag along for the ride). See you next week in the next article (I hope
you come back.)